A military jury decided this week to recommend the death sentence for convicted Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Hasan, the Army psychiatrist who killed 13 people and wounded another 32 when he opened fire on a building packed with unarmed soldiers and civilians in 2009. Before and during his trial, Hasan expressed his wish to die in order to become a Muslim martyr. His unorthodox defense at trial and the death sentence are reigniting debates about the purpose and meaning of the death penalty.

Americans’ views of the death penalty are complex.  Americans are nearly evenly divided on the policy question of whether people convicted of murder should receive the death penalty (46 percent) or be sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole (47 percent).  However, there is evidence that this national ambivalence seems grounded in concerns about the death penalty’s fair implementation, particularly with regard to non-white perpetrators, rather than in moral principle.  When asked about the morality of the death penalty, six-in-ten Americans (60 percent) say it is morally acceptable.

The Hasan case presents new elements to this debate. First, as the New York Times editorial page out, because of the peculiar circumstances of the case, “many of the usual arguments against the death penalty — that it’s arbitrary, that there’s the possibility of innocence — don’t apply.”  Absent these pragmatic arguments about unjust implementation, those opposing the death penalty for Hasan have to do so on the principled grounds that are currently shared by approximately one-third of Americans. The New York Times editorial board, for example, has staked out this ground. Interestingly, they also buttressed this argument with a consequentialist appeal, arguing that life in prison would have been the preferred route to take precisely because it denies him this last act of agency, and along with it the potential to be considered a hero among Islamic extremists.

But the recent history of how these convictions are carried out suggests that the principled opponents, pragmatic opponents, and proponents of the death penalty may see outcomes that are in practice not so far apart. Given the presidential approval required, on top of an often lengthy mandatory appeals process, the sentence may not get carried out for decades. Hasan joins five other servicemen facing lethal injection, and the last military execution was in 1961.


  1. Dudley Sharp

    Who cares what Nidal Hasan wants?

    Some say murderer Nidal Hasan should not have been given the death penalty, because that is what he wants, to achieve martyrdom.

    I could care less what he wants.

    The fascist/terrorists, imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay, are martyrs to their cause.

    Who cares, except for those very few fascist/terrorists who have no need for martyrs to continue in their hatred based campaigns of murdering good, innocent people, as Hasan did?

    Why don’t we pay attention to what is more important, that being why we give the sanctions that we do – justice.

    Why do some care more about what Hasan wants that what standards we live by?

    I could care less if Hasan thinks he will be a martyr, with either execution or incarceration.

    Hasan will soon be forgotten, as we continue making additional “martyrs” every day out of hatred based fascist/terrorists.

    It is the standards of America that we should stand by, not the sick beliefs of zealots who revel in murdering innocents.

    Murderous terrorists want to be martyrs? Line up. Justice will be served.

  2. I see a lot of interesting posts on your blog. You have to spend a lot of time writing,
    i know how to save you a lot of work, there is a tool that creates unique,
    SEO friendly posts in couple of minutes, just type in google – k2 unlimited content

  3. I read a lot of interesting content here. Probably you spend a lot of time
    writing, i know how to save you a lot of work, there is an online tool that
    creates high quality, SEO friendly posts in seconds, just type in google –
    laranitas free content source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Comments with many links may be automatically held for moderation.